Save money by buying your prescription medications at our Canadian Drug drug store Links
Canadian Drug Store, Florida Health Insurance, Medicare Supplemental Insurance, Long Term Care Insurance, Guaranteed Issue Health Insurance, Cheap Dental Insurance
The smear campaign against Israel Insider |
An Open Letter to Daniel Pipes, Steven Plaut, and Jonathan Tobin in response to their smear campaign against Israel Insider due to our decision to occasionally publish the writings of Barry Chamish. The correspondence from Pipes and his collaborators, mass-mailed to right-wing pundits including many Israel Insider columnists, are reprinted below, so readers can judge for themselves. The campaign also inveigled a leading big-paper columnist, a long-time colleague, who wrote to me and I responded candidly, as is reprinted below. However, the campaign protagonists, without the columnist's permission, then circulated this private communication. In the end that may be for the best, as I stand behind my comments to the columnist and regret not a word of my defense of the controversial Barry Chamish to express his views and our right at Israel Insider to publish them. We respect the ability of our readers the right to decide for themselves regarding the merits of his arguments. Following publication of the initial exchange, Pipes compounded his attempts at suppression -- this, too, and our response, is reprinted below. The initial Israel Insider response to Daniel Pipes Dear Dr. Pipes, At least it makes an amusing rhyme. Israel Insider has for four years, running daily, served as a forum for more than 500 writers from diverse points of view, contributing their perspective to show the diversity of views on and from Israel. You and Dr. Plaut and Mr. Tobin, who seem to be spearheading this smear campaign against Israel Insider for having the temerity to publish Barry Chamish's Lamentation for Adir Zik and some other pieces, are among them (each of you with more than 20 articles!). http://web.israelinsider.com/Views/3873.htm (Pipes) Obviously no one is challenging your right -- nor the right of any of your colleagues -- to submit or not submit to our publication. We provide an attractive and well-organized forum for your presentations and for our readers to talkback, and we have occasionally, and selectively, done the same for Mr. Chamish. As an objective observer, I must say that your curious obsession with Chamish is perplexing. I understand that there is bad blood between you and a history of attacks and counter-attacks. But that doesn't quite explain why that needs to extend to attacking publications which publish his writings. Surely you have enough outlets for your own opinions, without needing to squelch those of another writer who lacks the funding and connections that you enjoy! What is about Chamish's opinion that move you so to try to go to such great lengths to censor him, and us? Isn't it possible that he is right about some issues and wrong about others? Can't readers be allowed to distinguish for themselves? I respect my readers, and fellow writers, editors and publishers enough to believe that they can read and form opinions and their own, without being censored or scared away by name-calling and gratuitous insults. Perhaps the "responsible right" -- to which you clearly believe you deserve to belong -- should assume also the responsibility to tolerate more dissent and differing opinions in our own ranks. And when you write that I have "wildly attacked" you, you should either support that with at least one example of such an attack, or risk being dismissed as, well, paranoid or -- to use your own words -- a "nasty loon." I have never written an insulting word against you personally, nor do I intend to. Although I do think you have not sufficiently explained your comment: "Should the [Israeli] government go ahead with the forcible removal of Jewish residents of Gaza, intra-Israeli violence appears to be a distinct possibility. Which in turn makes me wonder why the Israeli authorities do not take quite a different track and merely stop providing security for them." While I see that you have gone to great lengths to rationalize these comments, I am gratify to see that, in the end (http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/287), you regret them and realize the error of your ways. I hope this suffices to end this little campaign of you and your buddies. All of you are welcome to keep contributing to Israel Insider, as long as you stop trying to squelch the opinions of others. But if you or your colleagues decide not to publish, I am sure we will find a way to survive without you. I am sure your correspondents can also form their own opinons about whether they wish to give in to your censorship and boycott attempts, and I welcome those who have not contributed to our publication to see Israel Insider as a tolerant and diverse platform for news and views about the future of Israel. It is this we should be working on, not fighting among ourselves. Shabbat shalom to all! Reuven Koret What preceded and prompted our response -----Original Message----- In a message dated 10-Feb-05 2:31:34 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, splaut@econ.haifa.ac.il writes [quoting Koret]: We Jews and journalists especially careful about ad hominem attacks. Read the pieces of Chamish and judge for yourself. this is rich, coming from someone (Reuven Koret) defending Chamish who has for years been attacking wildly all sorts of people, including yours truly. this is not a grudge match between Plaut and Chamish but an ugly situation in which of the responsible right need to disassociate ourselves from a nasty loon. for anyone interested in more on this topic, see http://www.danielpipes.org/blog/189 Daniel Pipes From: Steven Plaut [mailto:splaut@econ.haifa.ac.il] I will no longer be publishing anything with Israel Insider. I
suggest that you do the same. It is a disgrace to appear on the
same pages with Barry Chamish. The editor of Israel Insider is a
moron and a buffoon. On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Tobin, Jonathan wrote: Steve: I reached out to [the big-city columnist] and asked him to join us in writing to Koret about Chamish. He agreed and wrote to him today. Although I did not rate a reply from the great publisher, [big-city columnist] got one right back. Here it is, along with [big-city columnist]'s original e-mail. All the best, Jonathan From: [big-city columnist] Hi, Reuven, I understand that Steve Plaut, Daniel Pipes, and Jonathan Tobin have been urging you to stop promoting the conspiracy theories of Barry Chamish on your web site. Please add my plea to theirs. I don't know Chamish personally, but his writing has always struck me as reckless and unsubstantiated. I wouldn't want people thinking that my commentary is as unreliable and outlandish as his. Please don't undermine the credibility of Israel Insider and your other commentators by including Chamish's bizarre material on the site. It only undercuts the effectiveness and seriousness of what you are trying to achieve. All the best, [Tobin:] Here's what Reuven wrote in response.
I accept nothing Chamish says at face value, and I publish only a fraction of what he writes. I edit tough even when I do publish. But even paranoids have people out to get them. The man has guts, good instincts, and has a veracity batting average at least as good as Plaut's. Now he's not Ted Williams, but I think he is more or less onto the truth about the Rabin assassination, and I have found that some, not all, of his other "conspiracy theories" have at least grains of truth. We Jews and journalists especially careful about ad hominem attacks. Read the pieces of Chamish and judge for yourself. http://web.israelinsider.com/Views/4964.htm Reuven ADDENDUM: Dr. Pipes moves to suppress Dear Mr. Koret: In reference to your note to me, there is no "smear" campaign -- no one has said a bad word about your website -- but there was a quiet "pressure" campaign to get you to choose between Barry Chamish and several of us writers. You decided to go public with this, not us, a decision I wish you had not made. I did not give you permission to quote my private letter, one not
even addressed to you, on the internet, and I request you take it
down immediately. Insider Response: We are not so easily moved Dr. Pipes, A "private letter" sent around to twenty-five editors and columnists, urging them to take action to boycott or pressure a publication (whose name appears in the subject line) unless it censors a writer you and your friends don't like is not "going public"? Your comment, and Plaut's, would qualify as belonging to the public domain in any court in the land (any land!). My citation of it, which refers to me personally in a depreciatory manner, is certainly within my rights, both in terms of free speech and fair use. Do you think the phrase "moron and buffoon" (Plaut's words for the "Editor of Israel Insider," circulated in the letter that the pundits above received) qualifies as a "smear," or do you disavow all association with Plaut as "several of us writers?" Indeed it is Tobin (who says he did it unintentionally) and Plaut (who certainly did it intentionally) who circulated my private response to Jacoby, much to [the big-city columnist's] chagrin and displeasure. He who lives in a glass house shouldn't thrown stones. If you really want to bring this issue to broader attention, or to take legal action, I invite you to do so, as I think this whole affair only casts you and your colleagues in a most unfavorable light and brings even more attention to Mr. Chamish and his opinions, and to Israel Insider as a publication with the guts to take on those who would suppress unpopular opinions. And I must further correct you when you say that I am defending Chamish. I am defending his right to express his opinion and my willingness at the publisher of Israel Insider to take on would-be bullies, backed by powerful organizations and interests, who use routinely use scare tactics and legal threats in an attempt to stifle free speech and freedom of the press. Shabbat shalom.
Friday, July 15/05. I am invited to lecture in Gush Katif at the Neve Dekalim Community Center on Sunday, but two applications to the IDF have been turned down. The army doesn't want me in. On Sunday morning a way in was found, that better left unexplained. A rabbi asks that I come early to hear some vital information. On Sunday afternoon I was in Gush Katif for the first time in a week. How it had changed! The IDF had built huge bases in just one week and the trucks, bulldozers, tanks and sundry heavy equipment were parked for miles. All was ready for an attack. The August 15th date will prove to be another deception. The rape of Gush Katif will likely begin right after a rigged protest march ends on Wednesday. Meanwhile, there are no preparations for defence within Gush Katif. Nothing, not even jerrycans of fuel to raze their hothouses, was in place. Worse still, the residents are letting the army and police enter their villages freely. I'm aghast. Why are they letting their executioners have free rein of their villages? Why aren't they fighting back already? As I arrive, a Kassam rocket falls on Neve Dekelim 200 yards from me, badly wounding a Chabad rabbi. It is the fifth time he's been attacked and many residents tell me he is being targeted. |
Before my lecture, I meet with three rabbinical scholars, and after the lecture with a former woman student of Rabbi Shlomo Aviner, one of the organizers of the last gasp protest march set for the next day. They have gathered damning evidence that Aviner is a Shabak plant inside the Yesha Council. They are certain he has already sabotaged the march beyond repair. The evidence is indeed damning. In one of his books, Aviner admits to working for an Israeli intelligence agency. He told the Maariv reporter Kalman Lipskind that, "Every now and then the Shabak asks me to write an article for them." As the case builds, one scholar makes the claim that Aviner is a Sabbataian. He notes that his name appeared on an internet list of Israeli freemasons. He has been brought before rabbinic courts for falsifying decrees concerning the correct time for marital relations. In the religious world, this is about as serious a charge as can be laid. It means he sanctioned children born into sin. "And it's Aviner," I was told," who has been destroying the resistance movement from within. It is he who has ordered his soldier students to obey commands to attack us. It is he who has decreed no resistance to the police. And he is a major organizer of tomorrow's march, so you can be sure it will be a sham." The lecture hall is packed. I give the speech of my life. The audience is stunned but come question time, their meekness is revealed. One woman tells me no Jewish soldier would hurt another Jew. I answer that foreign soldiers wearing IDF uniforms will do the dirty work. Soldiers without ten words of Hebrew in their vocabulary, had already practised beating on protesters in Tsfat the week before. The next day one of the audience, Doron, traveled to Kissufim Junction to talk to the soldiers. He phoned me right after. "You were right. They're not Israeli. They barely speak any Hebrew. One told me he was Spanish." Another question; "You see conspiracies everywhere. Why should we believe you?" "I see them only where they are provably real. And those tanks at your borders are as real as proof gets. What is the matter with you? You are back in Poland, 1942. The gestapo is primed to drag you out of your homes handcuffed and lead you away in trucks. Who do you want to believe, me or them?" Question: "Then what can we do against all that power?" Answer: "You can stand up and fight them like proud Jews defending your homes. If you go down, go down with dignity." On the way back, I stop into Kfar Darom for refreshment from the oppressive heat. A beautiful stone synagogue stands nobly in the square. My host proudly notes, "We just finished it last month." "Fine," I thought. "Now let's see you defend it." |
web site for Medicare Supplemental Insurance supplement plan
www.best Medicare Supplemental Advantage.com
|
| Back to top | Barry`s Archive Index | Back to BarryChamish.com |