 Please click here to buy Barry`s books, CD`s & Videos... Prescriptions, Health Insurance, Medicare, Long Term Care, Guaranteed, Dental |
Barry Chamish Newsletter Archives
February 17 - Discord, Deceit and Disinformation
February 7 - Rabin's Magic Disappearing Hole
Back to Barry`s Archive Index
February 17, 2002 - DISCORD, DECEIT AND DISINFORMATION
It seems like the wrong time to expose how the Council On Foreign
Relations uses discord and deceit to push through its murderous Israeli
agenda. After all, this week it's Europe's turn to get Israel. The EU's
foreign ministers, led by the German cutthroat Joschka Fischer will meet
in
Brussels and reward the PLO for its unrelenting slaughter with a state.
I had prepared an article called The Astonishing
Secrets Of Europe's
Plot Against Israel as a prelude to the meeting. Included within was
Fischer's order to PM Sharon not to retaliate after the Dolphinarium blast,
which murdered twenty young people down the block from his Tel Aviv hotel
last summer. But we'll get to Fischer and Europe in the next installment,
once my readers absorb the reality of the upcoming European plans for
Israel.
Instead, circumstances call for an expose of
the CFR's use of
disinformation, because I'm a victim of it and I'm getting quite tired
of
it all.
In my case, the 3800 member Manhattan think tank
is using its pawns to
denigrate me in the American right wing Jewish community, as illustrated
by
an attack which was just published in the magazine outlet of Americans
For
A Safe Israel. The attack is pathetic and utilizes the same stupid
arguments the attackers have used for the past two years. Conspiracy
theories against Jews and Israel are all wrong, therefore there could
not
have been a conspiracy to murder Yitzhak Rabin. I have written about weird
subjects therefore I have no credibility. And my expose of Rabin's murder
has no evidence to back it up. False claims all of them and, as always,
not
many readers will be fooled.
Here is how such a campaign of discordant falsehood
is organized. You
start with one CFR member Richard Pipes, who is not just any old CIA
employee but past head of the CIA's Soviet research department. The apple
falls right by the tree as his son, CFR member Daniel Pipes receives
slightly indirect CFR funding to run a "think" tank in Philadelphia,
serving CFR interests. In the recent past, D. Pipes has been called upon
to
neutralize "conspiracy" theories and he wrote inferior articles
resulting
in an inferior book on the subject. Today, his role is to spread hatred
against Islam, while his CFR superiors publicly profess no objection to
the
religion as they blow Afghanistan to smithereens and draw up battle plans
to capture the Middle East.
Pipes has attacked my work in his institute's
barely-read journal but
the real work has been passed to a buddy of his, an unknown economics
teacher based in Haifa. Numerous readers have sent me background on this
creep, and he's just as tied up with the ruling establishment as his
mentor. He was trained, groomed and financed by the American Federal
Reserve, and apparently sent to Israel in the 80s to instill that peculiar
globalist economic theory that insists local economies must be "reformed"
through "liberalization," or in short, local industries must
be wrecked in
order to make way for American corporations.
But as a former colleague of his explained,
"He got nowhere. People
in his field saw him as a screwball whose ideas were off the wall. He
was
dismissed as irrelevant ten years ago." Trying to be known for something,
he is a willing partner in the smear campaign against me. Yes, he is an
infiltrator sowing discord among right wing American Jews. And he's not
the
only one. Others have made the same claim against one Murray Kahl, whose
role seems to be the venting of Jewish anger towards harmless issues.
So
let us counterattack against infiltration with a simply amazing piece
of
evidence given to me last week by the director of the Root And Branch
Society, Aryeh Gallin.
Up until now, the best proof of the CFR's
nefarious Israeli agenda
was their Middle East Task Force Report of July, 1997, which, in barely
couched terms, called for Israel's withdrawal to its 1948 borders and
the
division of Jerusalem. That task force was headed by one Henry Seigman,
who
receives $200,000 a year from the EU to spread anti-Israel disinformation
in the world media. That fact was intended for my Astonishing EU Secrets
article but let's let one cat out of the bag early.
Now, we have in hand an even more detailed
proof of CFR chicanery
against Israel in the form of a whole study called A Changing Israel by
Peter Grose - A Council On Foreign Relations Book. This book was published
by Vintage Books in 1984. It is a CFR policy book and thereafter became
the
official diplomacy of such CFR members as James Baker, George Shultz,
Warren Christopher, Bill Clinton and Madeleine Albright. Like all CFR
publications, it tries hard to appear to be balanced but upon, even the
most cursory reading, comes up a transparent piece of deception. The
author's method is to relay his views and those of his CFR bosses, through
the quotes of others, almost always anonymously.
Look at the claims of the preface: "The
author of this book, director
of the Council's Middle East program, visited Israel twice during the
study
to confirm facts and impressions... A generous grant from the Ford
Foundation underwrote the costs of bringing Israeli discussion leaders
to
this country...The groups were deliberately diverse..."
Diverse? A list of some fifty discussion
leaders follows. I saw one
name that I recognized as a right wing leader, Eliahu Ben Elissar, who
was
assassinated in Paris a few years ago. All the rest were of the likes
of
Meron Benvenesti, recipient of Ford Foundation money during this period
to
head a West Bank anti-settlement watchdog group: Arthur Hertzberg, a rabbi
and partner of CFR member Charles Bronfman, best known in certain circles
for their work with the UN to spread a one world religion; Samuel Lewis,
the former American ambassador to Israel and recent signer of a petition
less than indirectly supporting Arafat's regime of terror; Itamar
Rabinovich, the Israeli diplomat who negotiated away the Golan Heights
to
Syria; and a man who needs no introduction in war-torn former Yugoslavia
or
anywhere, Cyrus Vance.
Of the Vance connection, let's look at
the author's short biography:
"Peter Grose is managing editor of Foreign Affairs and a Senior Fellow
of
the Council On Foreign Relations. A longtime correspondent for the New
York
Times; he was bureau chief in Moscow, Israel and at the United Nations
and
later served on the Policy Planning Staff of the State Department under
Cyrus Vance."
Now let us look at this study and get a
rare glimpse at the CFR's
Israeli agenda.
THE CFR'S ATTITUDE TOWARDS ISRAELIS
If you are a member of any political group
from Labor to its left,
you are described as "thoughtful" or at the worst, "dovish."
Take a gander
at the adjectives if you are not:
"Those espousing the more militant
ideologies of the Likud...allowed
adventurist leaders to pursue a ruinous, inflationary economic policy..."
pp 4
"They told me their dismay over
the hard-line policies of the Likud
government...and the danger for the future survival of Israel."
pp 6-7
"...the fanatic rabbi Meir Kahane,
considered an abomination by
moderate Israelis." pp 9
"As Begin's rhetoric unfolded,
his dogmatic assertions about Jewish
rights and Arab perfidy sounded clear and satisfying (to Sephardi
Jews)." pp 28 But the good news is that, "Sephardi
soldiers returned
from the 1982 invasion of Lebanon expressing the same disgust as their
Ashkenazi partners." pp 40
"Gaining strength along with
this generalized rediscovery of Jewish
roots was its extremist expression..." pp 44
"Secular Israelis are
troubled by the appeal of the narrow,
traditionally religious Jewish radicals, particularly to the young."
pp 127
There you have it. Israelis to the right of Labor
are all extremists
and endanger Israel's future. Of course, Grose could not have known that
the people who would eventually endanger Israel's future are the
"moderates" of Labor-left who brought us the dubious gifts of
the CFR's
Oslo "peace" process eight years later. After all, Grose, was
merely a
tool, preparing the ground for later public acceptance of Oslo.
Or maybe,
he actually knew what he was doing, which means he is personally
responsible for thousands of Jewish and Arab casualties.
SHARON AND THE CFR
Sharon's CFR ties have previously been
examined in depth. They began
in 1974 with a meeting between him and Henry Kissinger. His role was to
infiltrate and destroy the Herut movement and he succeeded nearly
completely. However, according to this study, Sharon rebelled against
the
CFR in 1982 with his Lebanon policies. I would take the following passages
with a grain of salt and consider the likelihood that Sharon was actually
pursuing the war the way his masters desired. Nonetheless, examine the
CFR's attitude to the current prime minister in light of his impotence
to
protect his people.
"Dissent reached a critical level over the
military campaign in
Lebanon, a war undertaken at Israel's initiative, under dubious political
controls and for aims far broader than merely to counter any immediate
threats to the life of the population." pp 90. So while
Grose
conveniently forgets that a constant barrage of Katyushas threatening
lives, along with a series of terror attacks from Lebanon, taking lives,
was the prime reason for the Lebanese invasion, it offers him the
opportunity to go for Sharon's jugular. "The political leadership,
supposedly operating under a system of collective responsibility, was
manipulated during the weeks of combat by one member, Defense Minister
Ariel Sharon. Begin and his colleagues were kept substantially in the
dark
about crucial military decisions until it was too late to alter them."
pp
92. On this point we agree, the difference is my claim that one
of
Sharon's goals was to destroy Begin and his Herut movement through his
conduct of the war; a pre-agreed CFR policy. This is the belief, minus
the
CFR, of Begin's son, Binyamin. Still, Grose's wrath knows no bounds when
it
comes to Sharon's doctrine of defense.
"Sharon's bold strategic doctrine rested
on four premises:
- The concept of
strategic defense aimed at altering the
political status quo on Israel's borders, was to replace the longstanding
posture which had been intended to maintain the status quo.
- Military operations
were to be initiated whenever targets of
opportunity presented themselves; national survival required the dulling
of
enemy capabilities.
- Tsahal's central
mission was to keep hostile forces off balance
by initiating anti-terrorist operations, rather than maintaining a
defensive stance to counter basic threats to the Jewish state.
- The government
was to maintain the capability to make strategic
decisions quickly, based on the judgments of the responsible military
and
security officers, without necessarily seeking national consensus...
"For all the traumas of Lebanon, the Sharon
doctrine is not
universally discredited, particularly among the hard-line extremists who
registered such a strong showing in the 1984 election. Sharon is not spent
as a political force...Israelis pride themselves on greater sensitivity
to
casualties than Arabs, but the offensive operations called for under Sharon
would inevitably produce higher casualties." pp 99-100
"Military cooperation would grow less
defensible in Washington, of
course, were Israel to continue the adventurist, military policies of
the
Sharon doctrine." pp 116
Imagine the nerve of this Sharon! He actually
favored taking out
Israel's enemies before they murder
Israelis. Well, the CFR had to put a stop to this. And they did. Sharon
has
a thousand more reasons to invade the PLO Authority than he ever did to
enter Lebanon but he is incapable of acting. His CFR masters clearly
wouldn't like it if he did and one can only imagine what is making him
obey
them. Meanwhile, the CFR restraint option is producing the desired effect;
Israeli casualties are far higher than would have been if the so-called
intifada had been forcefully nipped in the bud the minute the Israeli
public gave Sharon the mandate to do so. The Grose book states without
hesitation or shame that the CFR would never allow Sharon
again to
change the status quo through pre-emptive strikes. From now on, Sharon
could only react and retaliate, and moderately at that, thus turning
Israelis into the sitting ducks of the CFR.
THE GRAND DECEIT
Of all the self-serving chutzpah seen in
various CFR publications,
none is more outstanding than Grose's total denial that international
forces are coordinating the Middle East violence. Forget that after Word
War 1, the CFR and their British buddies created the new Middle East.
Forget that Labor Zionism was their creation, as was the never before
heard
of Palestinian Arab nation. Why recall that their oil companies run Saudi
Arabia and the Gulf States and placed the Hussein clan in power in Jordan
and Iraq?
Absolutely incredibly, Grose denies that
the current conflict is
being manipulated by the very forces he works for and this lie may have
been a primary motive for his book. However, this claim is so shabby and
shallow that he contradicts it more often than he supports it. Watch the
argument break down before your eyes.
"For generations the people on both sides
have deceived themselves
into supposing that the conflict was external to themselves, the clash
of
foreign forces...A quite different prospect could emerge if the two sides
recognized how mutually destructive that portrayal has been through the
twentieth century. Forces external to Palestine have clearly manipulated
the rivalry of the two claimants to the land, but can it honestly be said
that the rivalry originates with outsiders? Israelis and Palestinians
might
well consider the hypothesis that they only have themselves to reckon
with." pp 79
"Looking upon the Arab-Israeli reality in
this new light, as an
internal conflict, the concerned outsider can be excused for feeling like
a
latter-day Dr. Zhivago, watching a revolution that passed him by.
Ideologues on all sides continue to bewail the malignant influence of
external forces on Arab-Israeli relations...Problems could always be blamed
on external forces intent on stirring up trouble." pp 87,88
Now watch Grose cut his own ridiculous thesis
into pieces before your
unbelieving eyes.
"The policy of the British Mandate administration
starting in the
1920s, underscored the two communities' habits of separate development.
The
Mandate was committed to 'putting into effect the Balfour Declaration
and
to establishing a Jewish Agency' which would represent 'all the Jews'
the
world over. Externalization was thus enshrined in international law."
pp 80
"The only outlet for national expression
was within the new diaspora
of Palestinian refugees, with its strange mixture of internationally
supported charities and its obsessive military structure."
Nosiree. Those British and those international
charities aren't
initiating trouble in the Middle East. Nobody outside the region would
want
to do that. After all, what's there to gain by constant conflict except
control of the region and all its resources?
THE CFR'S ISRAELI AGENDA EXPOSED AND IT'S ABOUT TIME IT WAS UNDERSTOOD
The importance of the Grose book is that it exposes
the CFR's plans
from the 1980s. Look how they all came to fruition in the 1990s and then
realize that they and the State Department they control are directly and
deliberately responsible for the slow bleeding death of Israel at the
start
of the new century.
"The state of the Israeli economy is no longer
a purely internal matter
left to Israeli politicians. It is increasingly the American Treasury
that
underwrites the economic priorities defined in Jerusalem. This is a
situation calling for serious, quiet professional dialogue among friends,
and with Shimon Peres' visit to Washington, the dialogue has begun."
pp 70
"It is the attitudes in Washington that do the
most to assure the
security and well-being of the people and land of Israel."
pp 111
"Israelis have not found the costs of territorial
expansion too high a
price to pay. This could change if the Arabs within Israeli jurisdiction
become restive or if the financial burden of developing Jewish life in
Judea and Samaria starts to divert too much of the national treasure away
from social needs." pp 88
"Israel must have the legal and territorial
basis, it is argued, for
military action to assure the continued demilitarization of the West Bank
and Gaza. No Arab armor, artillery or missile batteries are to be deployed
in any surrendered territories. There is obviously little room in this
concept for an independent sovereign Palestinian state." pp
97
"A way has to be found to differentiate
convincingly between a stance
of firm support for Israel and a readiness to support whatever the Israeli
government of the day advocates...A proposal to move the United States
Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem is an example of an irresponsible
and
foolish litmus test. Its sole impact (would be) to spread mischief and
ill-feeling." pp 118-119
"The settlement budget, though small, is vulnerable
in any drive to cut
overall government spending and will be wound down in the coming
years." pp 119
"The extended borders reached in 1967 may well
hold firm for a long
time to come, in the absence of effective pressures from any source to
change them...Even the broader Palestinian question, for all its emotional
and humanitarian force, is important to US foreign policy only because
its
potential for spreading a populist instability throughout a strategic
quarter of the world." pp 123-24
"Another war would certainly change the equation;
a significant
increase in the level of violence along Israel's extended frontiers would
increase the costs of prolonged occupation. Opportunities for diplomatic
maneuver could arise...The United States, a would-be mediator, must be
ready to move fast in response to changing circumstances, even if it is
not
called upon to initiate a diplomatic process. pp 124-125
And there is the CFR plan in a nutshell. To force
Israel's removal
from its defensive positions, a fully armed PLO state must start a war.
Once the violence reaches a critical point, the US and its CFR Secretary
Of
State will negotiate an end to the conflict which will include the removal
of all Jews from the Golan Heights, Jordan Valley, Judea, Samaria and
Gaza.
Give the CFR some credit, they are good to their
word. And if Israelis
don't wake up mighty fast to their plans, they are going to find out just
what their word means. A good starting point would be for Israelis to
totally boycott all members of the CFR, starting with such American Jewish
leaders as Bronfman, Lauder, Hoenlin, Zuckerman, and Seigman.
We are all suffering from their infiltration
and it's time to say,
'enough'.
endPrescriptions,
Health Insurance, Medicare,
Long Term Care, Guaranteed, Dental
February 7, 2002 - RABIN'S MAGIC DISAPPEARING HOLE
It is 10:05 PM, Nov. 4,1995. Yitzhak Rabin is on the examination
table at Ichilov Hospital. He has no pulse or heartbeat. He has been shot
twice in his limousine by his bodyguard Yoram Rubin and it appears he
did
his job successfully. Nonetheless, doctors Mordechai Gutman and Nir Cohen
infuse Rabin with an enormous amount of blood and apply heart massage.
Their expertise does the trick: Rabin's pulse returns to 130, his heartbeat
to 90. He will likely survive.
Lying on a bed near him in the trauma dept. is
Yoram Rubin with a mild
wound caused by a bullet grazing his arm. His gun is in his holster. Dr.
Gabi Barabash, director general of the hospital arrives with Rabin's office
manager, Eitan Haber, now an editor of Yediot Ahronot. Haber converses
with
Shimon Peres in the hall while Dr. Barabash enters the treatment room
and
examines Rabin. After his examination, he walks to the hall to tell Peres
the good news: Rabin is going to make it.
Peres loses control. He picks up his cellular
phone and barks orders.
He then commands Barabash to clear the trauma room of all medical
personnel. The medical staff obey, all except Dr. Surkin. He shouts that
they'll have to kill him before he leaves his patients unattended. He
is
removed by force.
Peres now orders Haber to, "get in there
and get rid of all of Rabin's
things." Haber rushes in the room, collects Rabin's blood-soaked
possessions and absconds with them. Among his loot is a songsheet found
in
Rabin's jacket pocket.
Peres gives the final order to the highest ranking
Shabak officer
present, possibly the head of Shabak personnel, known only as Agent D
(dalet). To this day his name remains the most closely guarded identity
secret of the Rabin assassination.
Agent D enters the treatment room, walks up to Rubin
and, in a menacing
voice tells him, "You screwed up. Now finish him off before he starts
telling people what you did."
"You think I can get away with it? It's
crazy. Another shot will be
noticed," answers Rubin.
"Not necessarily. Shoot him from the front
opposite the back wound and
they'll think it's the same shot. That is an order from the top."
A crazy plan but Rubin removes his gun from the
holster, attaches the
silencer he used in the limousine, approaches Rabin's bed, puts the barrel
on his naked chest and blasts. There is no longer any danger that Rabin
will talk.
Agent D grabs Rubin's pistol saying, "I'm
taking that. Get back in
your bed." The weapon is never seen again.
Outside, the surgical team has gathered and Rabin
is rushed to the
operating theater. Of the seventeen man and woman team, only four saw
Rabin
when he arrived at reception. They are the only ones to know that Rabin's
chest wound has changed dramatically. Now, there is an entry wound from
the
front which shatters the spinal cord. Dr. Gutman records the wound in
three
separate documents and Dr. Barabash announced it on television as the
cause
of Rabin's death.
The murderers panic. They have to re-arrange
the evidence to suit the
new wound. They contact the police coroner, Dr. Yehuda Hiss and order
him
to write that a bullet pierced Rabin's clothing from the front. He does
so
but makes a damning error: he writes that the bullet hole was 6 mm when
Rabin's other wounds were caused by 9 mm bullets.
The terrified assassination squad rifles through
Rabin's possessions
that Haber absconded with. They find a bloodless sheet of paper in Rabin's
jacket pocket. It is the songsheet that he sang from on the podium. They
decide to turn it into evidence. Blood, whose we don't know yet, was poured
on the sheet at the point in the middle where the sheet was folded into
four nearly equal quarters. Now a bullet hole had to be added and a round
black stain was slowly but clumsily made in one of the quarters with a
lit
cigarette.
"Is that good enough?," the agent
asked his commander.
"It'll have to do. Give it to Haber
and let him show it off. It
should convince the public that Rabin was shot from the front."
Haber did as he was told and at Rabin's
funeral he showed the sheet
to the world, along with it's bullet hole in one quarter. Shimon Peres,
in
his eulogy, noted that Rabin was shot through the Song Of Peace. The myth
began.
And so did the problems. No witness saw
the alleged assassin, Yigal
Amir, shoot from the front. And then a film of the assassination emerged
which proved that Amir never shot Rabin from the front. Then witness after
witness testified to the Shamgar Commission Of Inquiry that Amir shot
Rabin
in the back.
Yet, there was a hole in the bloody songsheet.
If Rabin was only shot
in the back, where did the blood come from? And Rabin folded the sheet
in
four. If a bullet went through it, there should have been four holes.
Peres chose to ignore all the witnesses
and the findings of the
Shamgar Commission. In a 1997 PBS interview, he insisted that he was in
Rabin's room, saw the body and one of the three bullet holes in Rabin
passed through the songsheet.
He chose the wrong strategy. Shamgar and
the government had already
concluded Rabin was shot only in the back. Peres insisted that he was
also
shot in the front. He, of course, told the truth. But only the murderers
knew about the hole in the sheet because they put it there. So how did
Peres know?!?
This songsheet and its bullet hole had
now become a major problem and
in October 2001, the newspaper Makor Rishon decided to finally investigate.
The sheet is stored in the Prime Minister's Archive in Jerusalem and Makor
Rishon's reporter asked to see it. He was told it was unavailable for
viewing because of security considerations. Why, asked the reporter, is
a
songsheet top secret? Alright, replied the archivist, we'll compromise.
We'll send you a photo of the songsheet. Give us a day to photograph it.
At press time, the photo arrived and was
published in the newspaper.
To the editors' amazement, the bullet hole was gone. How very convenient
for Peres and his gang. Now Peres could simply explain that he was wrong
about "the bullet which pierced Rabin's heart through the Song Of
Peace."
Except for a couple of problems. One, Makor
Rishon phoned Haber who
insisted there was a hole in the sheet he held at Rabin's funeral. And
two,
there are photos of Haber displaying it.
So here they are. In the first jpg, we
see the songsheet as it was
photographed on November 7, 1995. In the second jpg, we see the songsheet
as it exists today in the Prime Minister's Archive.
A magic disappearing hole. Does anyone
need better proof of blatant
evidence tampering?
***
Please click here to buy Barry`s books, CD`s & Videos...